← Back to No Halo News

No Halo News · Sourced development

Georgia attorney general sues SDG Impact Fund, alleging charitable assets paid personal expenses

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr filed a Fulton County Superior Court complaint against SDG Impact Fund, its reported successor entity and two current or former leaders. The complaint alleges that charitable assets were diverted to expenses including private-school tuition, vacations, mortgages, car loans, legal costs and consumer purchases. The state seeks restitution, civil penalties and appointment of a receiver to control and examine the defendants’ assets.

Status matters. This page records a sourced development, not a completed No Halo investigation. An allegation is not a finding. Dismissals, settlements, judgments, corrections and final outcomes remain distinct.

Donor relevance

Why this matters

The litigation concerns the handling and proposed recovery of donor-advised charitable assets. A receiver, if appointed, could take control of records and funds while the court determines what happened to donor contributions.

Attribution

Who reported or established this

The misuse and deception claims are allegations in a civil complaint filed by the Georgia attorney general. WSB-TV separately reported on the filing and prior statements from executive director Anthony Suber.

Evidence limits

What remains unverified

No Halo has not established that the defendants committed the alleged violations, confirmed the current value or location of the reported assets, or determined how much money may ultimately be recovered for donors or charitable beneficiaries.

Right of reply

Organization response

WSB-TV reported that Suber had previously said donor recommendations were subject to the organization’s final decision and asserted that SDG was entitled to fees equal to roughly 5% of assets managed. No response to the September 25 complaint was located in the consulted material.

Classification

How No Halo records this event

Event type: Filing. Current state: Open. No Halo preserves the current procedural state rather than treating every mention as a finding.

Published September 25, 2026 · Last verified September 28, 2026. See an error or a later outcome? Submit a correction or right of reply.